Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Syre

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 29, 1985No. 2248PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, Judge:

Appellant was convicted of witness tampering. The Superior Court, 322 Pa.Super. 416, 469 A.2d 1059, found the evidence insufficient to support the conviction and reversed. The Supreme Court, 507 Pa. 299, 489 A.2d 1340, found the evidence sufficient and reversed the Superior Court. The case is now before us on remand to address the remaining claims. One of appellant’s contentions is that the jury which convicted him was improperly influenced. We agree and therefore reverse and remand for a new trial.

Testimony from the jurors themselves revealed several significant contacts…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RussellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. McCormickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. GibsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. SyreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Com. v. SyreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API