Legal Opinion

Baltimore & Annapolis Railroad v. Lichtenberg

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 8, 1939No. [Nos. 47, 48, January Term, 1939.]PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.

Complaint was made to the Public Service Commission by the Baltimore & Annapolis Railroad Company, under the Code (Supp. 1935), art. 56, sec. 255A, that the appellees were engaging in the carriage of day laborers in motor trucks over the highways of the state between Baltimore and Annapolis, under contract with the United States Government, without compliance with the statutes governing contract carriers, and were thus subjecting the railroad to unrestricted and unregulated competiton in the territory served by it. Code (Supp. 1935), art. 56, secs. 251 and 252. The commission, after having…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Stephenson v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Continental Baking Co. v. WoodringSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Hicklin v. ConeySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Vanderford v. Farmers' & Mechanics' National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Public Util. Comm'n of Cal. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. James Stewart & Co. v. SadrakulaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Penn Dairies, Inc. v. Milk Control Comm'n of Pa.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. State v. PaganoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. Chayt v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API