Williams v. General Electric Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
MARBLEY, District Judge.
I. Introduction
This matter is before the Court on Defendants The General Electric Company, Michael Coleman, Norris Woodruff, and Lloyd Trotter’s Motion for Summary Judgment. For the following reasons, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and Plaintiffs disability discrimination claims are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. 1
II. Facts
Because this matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, the Court will view the facts in the light most favorable to Plaintiff.
Jerome B. Williams…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Payton v. Receivables Outsourcing, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Hodges v. City of MilfordDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- Sheridan v. Jackson Township Division of Fire, 08ap-771 (3-19-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Tanksley v. HowellOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Brahmamdam v. Trihealth G, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.