Legal Opinion
Tanksley v. Howell
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 1, 2020No. 19AP-504PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Tanksley v. Howell,
2020-Ohio-4278.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Malcolm Tanksley, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 19AP-504 (C.P.C. No. 18CV-2296) v. : Cecil Howell et al., : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Defendants-Appellees. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on September 1, 2020 On brief: Rosenberg & Ball Co., LPA, and David T. Ball, for appellant. On brief: Ron O'Brien, Prosecuting Attorney, Denise DePalma, and Nick A. Soulas, Jr., for appellees. APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas BROWN, J. {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Malcolm Tanksley, appeals from a…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Moody v. Ohio Dept. of Mental Health & Addiction Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Hinton v. Ohio Dept. of Youth Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Love v. ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Alapini v. SK Food GroupOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
- Burson v. Ohio Environmental Protection AgencyOhio Court of Claims · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.