Legal Opinion
Ray Fladeboe Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. New Motor Vehicle Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 14, 1992No. B060651PublishedCited by 6 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN, P. J.
Plaintiff and appellant Ray Fladeboe Lincoln-Mercury Inc., doing business as Ray Fladeboe British Motor Cars (Fladeboe), appeals the judgment of the trial court denying its consolidated petition for writ of administrative mandate. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5.) By its consolidated petition Fladeboe sought to overturn the decision of defendant and respondent New Motor Vehicle Board (the Board) which (1) allowed real party in interest Jaguar Cars, Inc. (Jaguar) to terminate Fladeboe’s Jaguar dealership, and (2) rejected Fladeboe’s petition for damages arising out of Jaguar’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. New Motor Vehicle BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Ri-Joyce, Inc. v. New Motor Vehicle BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
3Cited by6 opinions
- Automotive Management Group, Inc. v. New Motor Vehicle BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Hardin Oldsmobile v. New Motor Vehicle Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Miller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- South Bay Creditors Trust v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Mazda Motor of America, Inc. v. California New Motor Vehicle BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.