Legal Opinion
Miller v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 25, 1996No. G019178PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SILLS, P. J.
I. Introduction
Sometime after petitioners Ruth and Roger Miller bought a Honda dealership in Huntington Beach they were sued for not making payments to the sellers. The Millers then filed a cross-complaint against Honda 1 for fraud and unfair business practices. In essence, the Millers alleged that they could not make any money because they refused to bribe Honda executives to obtain their fair share of popular Honda models. On demurrer, the trial court stayed the cross-complaint indefinitely, pending review by an administrative agency known as the California New Motor…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- I. E. Associates v. Safeco Title InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Powerhouse Motorsports Group, Inc. v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Hardin Oldsmobile v. New Motor Vehicle Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- South Bay Creditors Trust v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Wise v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Tovas v. American Honda Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.