Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. v. Boatmen's Bank
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
.In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri; David P. Dyer, Judge. Action at law by the Boatmen’s Bank against the Chicago Mill & Dumber Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
The Boatmen’s Bank, plaintiff below, sued the Chicago Mill & Lumber Company, a business corporation organized under the laws of Illinois, on a promissory note of $25,000.
The defendant, for its answer, admitted liability on the note, but pleaded a counterclaim against the plaintiff of this kind: It alleged that the bank was a creditor in a large amount of a corporation known as the Tiger Tail Mill & Land Company, and also an owner of a large part of its capital stock, and as such had the control and management of its business and property, for its own use and benefit; that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Phillips v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- Union Savings & Trust Co. v. KrummWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- American Nat. Bank v. National Wall-Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Allis-Chalmers Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
3Cited by28 opinions
- Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Krivo Industrial Supply Company and Morgan Precision Parts, Inc. v. National Distillers and Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Irwin & Leighton, Inc. v. W.M. Anderson Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1987
- FAMM Steel, Inc. v. Sovereign BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Commerce Trust Co. v. WoodburyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.