Heilker v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Judge:
This appeal involves the application of a local zoning ordinance. The Zoning Board of Appeals for the City of Beaufort (“the Zoning Board”) ordered Phil Heilker to cease the outside display of indoor furniture at his retail stores. The Circuit Court reversed, finding Heilker’s displays were protected, nonconforming “uses” of his property. We reverse.
FACTSIPROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Heilker owns two discount furniture stores in the city of Beaufort. He has operated Mama’s Used Furniture for approximately ten years and Mama’s Discount Furniture Depot for approximately three years.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Kam v. NohHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
- Smith v. ZONING BD. OF HUNTINGDONCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Town of North Kingstown v. AlbertSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Georgia-Carolina Bail Bonds, Inc. v. County of AikenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Hernandez-Zuniga v. TickleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- Austin v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Triangle Fraternity v. City of Norman, Ex Rel. Norman Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.