Legal Opinion

Heilker v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 23, 2001No. 3374PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Judge:

This appeal involves the application of a local zoning ordinance. The Zoning Board of Appeals for the City of Beaufort (“the Zoning Board”) ordered Phil Heilker to cease the outside display of indoor furniture at his retail stores. The Circuit Court reversed, finding Heilker’s displays were protected, nonconforming “uses” of his property. We reverse.

FACTSIPROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Heilker owns two discount furniture stores in the city of Beaufort. He has operated Mama’s Used Furniture for approximately ten years and Mama’s Discount Furniture Depot for approximately three years.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  3. Kam v. NohHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Smith v. ZONING BD. OF HUNTINGDONCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Town of North Kingstown v. AlbertSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Georgia-Carolina Bail Bonds, Inc. v. County of AikenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  3. Hernandez-Zuniga v. TickleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Austin v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Triangle Fraternity v. City of Norman, Ex Rel. Norman Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API