Legal Opinion

Paige v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 6, 1990No. 88-1394PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. ("State Farm"), as subrogee of James S. Germany, sued Ernest Paige for damages resulting from fire loss to Germany's rental house allegedly caused by Paige's negligence. Paige filed a general denial. State Farm's motion for summary judgment was denied. Subsequently, the trial court heard the case without a jury and rendered a judgment for State Farm in the amount of $30,547. Paige's motion for a new trial was denied. Paige appealed. We affirm.

Under the ore tenus rule, the trial court's decision, where supported by the evidence, is presumed correct and should…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. King v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Robinson v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. City of Birmingham v. Sansing Sales of Birmingham, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. American Cas. Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Meeks v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. HesterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Bell v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. City of Birmingham v. Amsouth Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. City of Birmingham v. Amsouth Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Martin Electronics, Inc. v. Bill Steber Chevrolet-Oldsmobile, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API