Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Birmingham v. Amsouth Bank, N.A.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 13, 1991No. 1900799Published

1Dissent

I concur in the result reached by the majority insofar as it does not permit the City to collect back taxes, penalties, and interest; however, I disagree with both the rationale and the result reached by the majority insofar as it holds that the rules and regulations promulgated by the director of finance are void as a matter of law.

Looking to the language of Section 8 of the Ordinance, which specifically states that the regulations promulgated by the director of finance are binding on AmSouth as an employer, one sees that AmSouth was required to make a payroll deduction of 1% on all earnings…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Alabama Farm Bureau Mut. v. City of HartselleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  3. S & S DISTRIBUTING COMPANY v. Town of New HopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  4. Owen v. West Alabama Butane CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  5. Paige v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API