City of Birmingham v. Amsouth Bank, N.A.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Dissent
I concur in the result reached by the majority insofar as it does not permit the City to collect back taxes, penalties, and interest; however, I disagree with both the rationale and the result reached by the majority insofar as it holds that the rules and regulations promulgated by the director of finance are void as a matter of law.
Looking to the language of Section 8 of the Ordinance, which specifically states that the regulations promulgated by the director of finance are binding on AmSouth as an employer, one sees that AmSouth was required to make a payroll deduction of 1% on all earnings…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Alabama Farm Bureau Mut. v. City of HartselleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- S & S DISTRIBUTING COMPANY v. Town of New HopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Owen v. West Alabama Butane CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- Paige v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990