Bell v. Bell
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
HORNSBY, Chief Justice.
Cecil Bell sued William Bell because of a dispute over an east-west boundary line. He also sued Wylie Bell and William T. McElroy because of a dispute over a north-south boundary line. The trial court entered a judgment in favor of defendant William Bell in regard to the east-west boundary line dispute.1 Cecil Bell filed a motion for new trial, which the trial court denied, and Cecil Bell appeals. We affirm.
*149The trial court entered the following order:
“This matter having come before the Court upon the Complaint of the Plaintiff against [William Bell] and others [Wylie…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hall v. MazzoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Welch v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Helms v. TullisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Holland v. City of AlabasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Gilmer v. SalterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bell v. BellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994