Legal Opinion

Bell v. Bell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 12, 1991No. 89-1816PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HORNSBY, Chief Justice.

Cecil Bell sued William Bell because of a dispute over an east-west boundary line. He also sued Wylie Bell and William T. McElroy because of a dispute over a north-south boundary line. The trial court entered a judgment in favor of defendant William Bell in regard to the east-west boundary line dispute.1 Cecil Bell filed a motion for new trial, which the trial court denied, and Cecil Bell appeals. We affirm.

*149The trial court entered the following order:

“This matter having come before the Court upon the Complaint of the Plaintiff against [William Bell] and others [Wylie…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hall v. MazzoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Welch v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Helms v. TullisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Holland v. City of AlabasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Gilmer v. SalterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bell v. BellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API