Legal Opinion

Meeks v. Hill

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 26, 1990No. 88-1149PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The issue presented in this case is whether the trial court erred in ordering the removal of an obstruction on a road located in Autauga County. We affirm.

The basic facts are as follows: In 1961, the developer recorded a plat of the Forest Hills Subdivision in the Probate Court of Autauga County. The road in question, "David Street," is clearly depicted on that plat. The plat shows that one end of David Street intersects Indian Hill Road, a primary road running through the subdivision, and that the other end is a dead end. Horace and Sharon Meeks own lots abutting both sides of David Street…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Webb v. City of DemopolisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  2. Robinson v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Manning v. HouseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Western Railway v. Ala. Grand Trunk RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  5. Hall v. PolkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte FannSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Bearden v. EllisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Martin v. FIRST FEDERAL SAV. & LOANSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Sundance Marina, Inc. v. ReachSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Paige v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API