Parsille v. Brown
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Chippewa; Fead, J. Debt by Herbert L. Parsille, for the benefit of David Brown, against Hugh Brown and others on a judicial bond. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
The suit is upon a bond. The trial by the court and a jury resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff directed by the court. The court properly (Demill v. Moffat, 45 Mich. 410 [8 N. W. 79]; Bergstrom v. Staples, 82 Mich. 654, 657 [46 N. W. 1035]; Rayl v. Hammond’s Estate, 95 Mich. 22 [54 N. W. 693] ; Howey v. Fisher, 111 Mich. 422, 424 [69 N. W. 741] ; see, also, Tillotson v. Webber, 96 Mich. 144, 153 [55 N. W. 837] ; Hanley v. Balch, 106 Mich. 46 [63 N. W. 981]), stated the reasons for directing the verdict. One reason, the principal one, was that the admissions of defendant Brown in his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Demill v. MoffatMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Tillotson v. WebberMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Bergstrom v. StaplesMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Rayl v. Estate of HammondMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Hanley v. BalchMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Turner v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Goodman v. FangertMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Brown v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1917