Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Fangert

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1918No. Docket No. 69PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne; Webster, J. Ejectment by Hyman Goodman and another against Herman Fangert and others. Judgment for defendants on a directed verdict. Plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, brought this action in ejectment to recover from defendants possession of a piece of land 20x30 feet in size, covered by what they term a "little garage.” It is a small portion of the rear end of a property which they purchased on November 12, 1914, from Moses Remer and wife, described as lot 9 and the easterly 27% feet of lot 10, Meier’s subdivision of that part of outlot 37, private claim 182, between Ludden street and Gratiot avenue, Detroit, Michigan. Their purchase constitutes a piece of land 105.75 feet fronting on Mack avenue by 108.4 feet deep.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Randall v. ChubbMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Lewis v. SheldonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. White v. Huber Drug Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Totten v. TottenMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Wray-Austin Machinery Co. v. FlowerMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tyler v. WeedMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Boekeloo v. KuschinskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Bonninghausen v. GlannMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API