Bergstrom v. Staples
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Muskegon. (Dickerman, J.) Negligence case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
Plaintiff’s decedent, her husband, was an employé of defendants in their saw-mill. During the noon hour it was his duty to go down into the box of. the lower band-saw wheel and clean out the sawdust. This box, which inclosed the wheel, was constructed with & slanting bottom, so that the sawdust would slide down to the sawdust carrier. It was necessary to stand on the wheel while cleaning off the sawdust. The only access to this box was by climbing down on the wheel, and the only mode of egress was by climbing up the same way. The wheel was eight feet in diameter. The work could only be done…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Draws v. LevinMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- New Pittsburgh Coal & Coke Co. v. PetersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Spencer v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Galloway v. J. W. Turner Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Cooper v. Merchants' & Munufacturers' National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.