Legal Opinion

State v. Carter

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 28, 2000No. 97-257-C.APublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FLANDERS, Justice.

Safe haven? Preserver of life? Shelter from disaster? Not The Ark in this case. Instead, a botched break-in at a Newport bistro turned The Ark Restaurant (The Ark) 1 into a death vessel.

Convicted after a three-day trial of first-degree murder and breaking and entering a shop with intent to commit larceny, the defendant, William J. Carter (defendant or Carter), seeks an appellate Mount Ararat on which to rest his appeal. 2 He claims the trial justice committed multiple errors that warrant a new trial, including failing to suppress his confession to the police because…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. United States v. AndujarCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  4. State v. BettencourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
  5. State v. MariniSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. BidoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  2. State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  3. State v. SilviaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
  4. State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  5. State v. BrouillardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API