Legal Opinion
United States v. Andujar
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 6, 1995No. 92-2376 to 92-2378PublishedCited by 124 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TORRUELLA, Chief Judge.
On July 17, 1992, defendants Amador Iri-zarry-Sanabria, José Salvador Andújar, and Pedro Infante-Ruiz were convicted by a jury in federal district court for conspiracy to import approximately 3000 pounds of marijuana and for the possession of a firearm in relation to the commission of said narcotics offense, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a) and 963, and 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1), respectively. All defendants now appeal. José Salvador Andújar alleges that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. Amador Irizarry-Sanabria (1) challenges the sufficiency…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. BoylanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Johnny Rafael Batista-PolancoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Marco A. EcheverriCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by124 opinions
- United States v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- United States v. FulmerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Lucky IrorereCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Robert P. Deluca, Sr., United States of America v. Gerard T. Ouimette, United States of America v. Gerard T. OuimetteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.