Legal Opinion

Coffee v. Pere Marquette Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1905No. Docket No. 114PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Kent; Wolcott, J. Case by John Coffee against the Pere Marquette Railroad Company for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

Plaintiff received serious injuries as the result of a collision between his wagon and defendant’s locomotive. He brought this suit and recovered a judgment in the court below. Defendant asks us to reverse that judgment on this single ground, viz., that the trial court erred in not directing a verdict on the ground of plaintiff’s contributory negligence.

The facts are these: September 18, 1901, plaintiff delivered a load of freight at Metzger’s cold storage building, in the city of Grand Rapids, situated just west of Winter street. In driving from that building to Winter street, plaintiff had…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Guggenheim v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hintz v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Line v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Rouse v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Garran v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Halloran v. Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API