Legal Opinion

Garran v. Michigan Central Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1906No. Docket No. 176PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Wayne; Brooke, J. Case by Peter Garran against the Michigan Central Railroad Company for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment for injuries received at a street crossing from a train belonging *27to defendant. A motion for a new trial was made, which motion was overruled. The case is brought here by writ of error.

It is the claim of defendant that the record shows from the testimony of plaintiff’s witnesses that he was guilty of contributory negligence and that a verdict should have been directed in favor of defendant. No witnesses were sworn on the part of defendant. Joseph Campau avenue runs north and south. At its foot is the dock where the ferryboats stop. Two blocks from the river…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Guggenheim v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Ryan v. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Palmer v. Detroit, Lansing & Lake Michigan RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Mertz v. Detroit Electric RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Fillingham v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Hauff & Stormo v. South Dakota Central Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Luttenton v. Detroit, Jackson & Chicago Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Goodes v. Lansing & Suburban Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API