Powell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*561OPINION
JUSTICE DOUGHERTY
We granted discretionary review to consider whether an attorney who has been suspended from the practice of law by this Court may represent a claimant in unemployment compensation proceedings. A divided three-judge panel of the Commonwealth Court determined the claimant is entitled to his choice of representative, even if that representative is a suspended attorney, and remanded for a new hearing. We affirm the decision to remand, but reverse the Commonwealth Court’s holding that a suspended attorney may represent claimants in unemployment compensation proceedings.
This…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Buffalo Township v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Shortz v. FarrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Office of the Disciplinary Counsel v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Slater v. Rimar, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bucks Cnty. Servs., Inc. v. Phila. Parking Auth.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- A. Nabay v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Com. v. Lewis, N.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- In re: Petitions to Open Ballot Box ~ Appeal of: S.C. DawsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- M.N. Walker v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020