Legal Opinion

Powell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 2017No. Powell, G. v. UCBR, Aplt - No. 38 MAP 2016PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*561OPINION

JUSTICE DOUGHERTY

We granted discretionary review to consider whether an attorney who has been suspended from the practice of law by this Court may represent a claimant in unemployment compensation proceedings. A divided three-judge panel of the Commonwealth Court determined the claimant is entitled to his choice of representative, even if that representative is a suspended attorney, and remanded for a new hearing. We affirm the decision to remand, but reverse the Commonwealth Court’s holding that a suspended attorney may represent claimants in unemployment compensation proceedings.

This…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Buffalo Township v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Shortz v. FarrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Office of the Disciplinary Counsel v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Slater v. Rimar, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bucks Cnty. Servs., Inc. v. Phila. Parking Auth.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. A. Nabay v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. Com. v. Lewis, N.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. In re: Petitions to Open Ballot Box ~ Appeal of: S.C. DawsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. M.N. Walker v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API