Legal Opinion
Slater v. Rimar, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 17, 1975No. 283PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
POMEROY, Justice.
The proceeding from which this appeal arises commenced as a shareholder’s derivative suit in equity brought by the appellant, Morris Slater, against the appellees — Rimar, Inc. [hereinafter “Rimar”] Mt. Joy Mill-work, Inc. [hereinafter “Mt. Joy”], and Robert I. Martin in his capacities of president and chairman of the board of Rimar, president of Mt. Joy, and controlling shareholder in both corporations. Before expiration of the time for answering or otherwise responding to appellant’s complaint, the appellees filed on January 24, 1973, at the number and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,675 James M. Richardson v. Hamilton International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- EF Hutton & Company v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1969
- Emle Industries, Inc. v. Patentex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- General Motors Corp. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Jedwabny v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Maritrans GP Inc. v. Pepper, Hamilton & ScheetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Pirillo v. PirilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- In Re Estate of PedrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.