State v. Moore
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
In this case, we are called upon to decide whether a prosecutor has violated Crim. R. 16 by not producing, pursuant to a defendant’s timely and proper discovery request, all recorded statements made by such defendant. Further, if such a violation is found, it must be determined whether the violation was prejudicial to the defendant in order to avoid the effect of the harmless-error rule.
Crim. R. 16 provides in pertinent part:
“(A) Demand for discovery. Upon written request each party shall forthwith provide the discovery herein allowed. * * *”
It is uncontroverted that appellant made a proper…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. ParsonOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- United States v. Musa F. IsaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- United States v. SherwoodDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1981
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. JosephOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. SpirkoOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. Brewster, Unpublished Decision (6-11-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. PenceOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. JosephOhio Supreme Court · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.