Legal Opinion
State v. Brewster, Unpublished Decision (6-11-2004)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 11, 2004No. Appeal Nos. C-030024, C-030025UnpublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Garry Brewster, was convicted of one count of possessing criminal tools pursuant to R.C.2923.24(A), one count of tampering with evidence pursuant to R.C.2921.12(A)(1), and thirty counts of forgery pursuant to R.C.2913.31(A)(2), under two separate indictments. He appeals those convictions, raising thirteen assignments of error, which we address out of order. We find no merit in these assignments of error.
I. Speedy Trial
{¶ 2} In his sixth assignment of error, Brewster states that the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion to dismiss for lack of a…
2Cases cited95 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. LopezOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. LichtenwalterOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. HoustonOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. KinstleOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.