Legal Opinion

State v. Joseph

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1995No. 94-372PublishedCited by 149 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

In a line of cases beginning with State v. Poindexter (1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 1, 520 N.E.2d 568, we have adopted the view that when we review death-penalty cases, we are not required to address all propositions of law in opinion form. State v. Simko (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 483, 644 N.E.2d 345; State v. Scudder (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 263, 643 N.E.2d 524; State v. Hawkins (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 339, 612 N.E.2d 1227. Accordingly, we will not discuss the merits of many of appellant’s propositions of law which have been resolved in other cases or which have not been properly…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. MorelandOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. PoindexterOhio Supreme Court · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by149 opinions

  1. State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002

144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API