Legal Opinion
Bauman v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided January 17, 1972PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARNEY, Presiding Judge.
The complainant below, S. Richard Bau-man, has appealed from a decree of the Chancery Court dismissing his original bill against the defendants, Eulyse M. Smith, James B. Cartwright, and Arnold M. Weiss, in which he sought a money judgment for services rendered on a quantum meruit basis. Complainant Bauman, defendants Eulyse M. Smith, James B. Cartwright, and Arnold M. Weiss, in February, 1968, formed a partnership for the purpose of constructing a high-rise apartment building located at 232 South Highland, Memphis, Shelby County, Tennessee.
Complainant Bauman had been…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Paschall's, Inc. v. DozierTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
- Weatherly v. American Agricultural Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
- Dupont Rayon Co. v. RobersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930
- Robinson v. Durabilt Mfg. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1953
- Cultra v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hurt v. EarnhartCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1976
- Warren Bros. Co. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1976
- Dabora, Inc. v. KlineCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
- Davis v. Mason & Dixon Tank Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
- Dillard Construction, Inc. v. Haron Contracting Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.