Legal Opinion

Warren Bros. Co. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 6, 1976PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEARN, Judge.

This is a dispute over the terms of a contract.

Metro desired that certain improvements be made to a portion of Charlotte Avenue in Nashville. Under circumstances later set out, Warren Brothers agreed to do the work. A part of the work consisted of laying storm and sanitary sewers. Trenches had to be excavated in order to lay the storm and sanitary sewer lines. Rock had to be excavated in order to dig the trenches. Warren Brothers sought separate payment under the “rock excavation” provision of the contract. Metro refused payment claiming that the rock excavation provision was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Freeman v. Martin Robowash, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1970
  2. Allen v. NealTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Hankins v. WaddellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1942
  4. Bauman v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
  5. Connecticut Indemnity Company v. DeGallefordTennessee Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Castelli v. LienCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  2. Forrest Construction Co. v. LaughlinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
  3. WF Holt Co. v. a & E Elec. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  4. Tennessee Asphalt Co. v. Purcell Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  5. Keystone Leasing Corp. v. Peoples Protective Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API