Robinson v. Durabilt Mfg. Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinson
Durabilt Manufacturing Company, defendant-in-error, here, was the owner of a machine called a crop drier which it sold wholesale in various states of the union. Dixon Bobinson, plaintiff-in-error here, was experienced in the distribution and sale of articles of this nature in the southern states. Durabilt Manufacturing Company and Robinson entered into an oral contract whereby it was agreed that Bobinson should have the exclusive agency for the sale of this machine in a number of southern states, including Mississippi. He was to pay Durabilt $700 for each machine and sell it for whatever…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Weatherly v. American Agricultural Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
- Goodloe v. GoodloeTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
- Lazarov v. NunnallyTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
- Allen v. Elliott Reynolds Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
- Fildew v. BesleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by12 opinions
- Castelli v. LienCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- Doe v. University of the SouthDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2009
- Crye-Leike, Inc. v. Sarah A. CarverCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
- CPB Management., Inc. v. EverlyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
- Bauman v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.