Legal Opinion
State v. Aubid
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 8, 1999No. C4-97-2004PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANCASTER, Justice.
This matter involves a pretrial appeal from an order issued by the Carlton County District Court that excluded from the upcoming murder trial of appellant, Jamie Lee Aubid, the testimony codefendants Lester Greenleaf and Andy Leo DeVerney gave at their own joint trial. The court of appeals reversed the trial court and held (1) the prior tidal testimony of Greenleaf and DeVerney was admissible at Aubid’s trial under the catch-all exception to the hearsay rule, and (2) admission of this testimony would not violate Aubid’s Confrontation Clause rights. Aubid now seeks…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bobo v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. FieldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. HallmarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.