Legal Opinion
State v. King
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 1, 2001No. C9-99-298PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*802OPINION
PAUL H. ANDERSON, Justice.
In this case, we are asked to determine whether testimony given at a guilty plea hearing by an alleged accomplice to a crime bears adequate indicia of reliability such that it can be admitted against a criminal defendant charged with the same crime. A Washington County jury found defendant/appellant Arron King guilty of two counts of aiding and abetting first-degree burglary. At King’s trial, the state introduced a redacted version of the guilty plea testimony of King’s alleged accomplice. King objected to the use of the plea testimony on the grounds that it…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. CaulfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. BlancheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. DobbinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. BurrellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.