Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Wayans v. Wolfe

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided November 16, 1972No. File 131957PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.

The plaintiff has been arrested by and is confined under a governor’s warrant for extradition to California on a charge of murder. He has instituted habeas corpus proceedings to test the legality of his arrest. General Statutes § 54-166. No determination on the habeas application has been made because the scheduled hearing has been continued, at the plaintiff’s request, in order to obtain certain information from California which he considers material. Pending a hearing and determination by the court, the plaintiff: has moved to be admitted to bail. The defendant claims that, at this stage of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Winnick v. ReillySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  3. In Re Haney for a Writ of Habeas Corpus to Obtain BailIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  4. State v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Allen v. WildSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BynumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. Ex Parte BeverlySupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Ex Parte QuinnCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Deas v. WeinshienkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  5. Ex Parte ColbertCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API