Legal Opinion
Winnick v. Reilly
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 29, 1924PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
The first question raised by the appeal is as to whether the indictment substantially charges Hershman with a crime under the laws of New Jersey. Charging such crime substantially in the indictment is sufficient, as the counsel for Hershman concedes. Ross v. Crofutt, 84 Conn. 370, 373, 80 Atl. 90. The attack upon the indictment is based upon its failure to allege that anyone, in reliance upon the alleged false statement, parted with any property of the character specified in Chapter 241 of the Laws of New Jersey, Session of 1912, and its further failure to identify any particular property,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wright v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Styles v. TylerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Hayward v. PlantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Drinkall v. SpiegelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- State v. VaughanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Gaines v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Delevieleuse v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Liistro v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- State v. McCahillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Schiff v. BrennanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.