Legal Opinion

Deas v. Weinshienk

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 24, 1975No. 26701PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day

This is an original proceeding in the nature of mandamus in which we issued a rule to the district court to show cause why petitioner Deas should not be admitted to bail in an extradition proceeding. Upon response to the rule, we now determine to discharge it.

The petitioner was charged with having committed a crime in the state of Nevada. Before the governor’s warrant was issued, he was admitted to bail which was returnable on a day certain or upon issuance of the governor’s warrant. Upon the latter happen ing it was revoked and he was remanded to custody. A subsequent motion for setting of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Grano v. StateSuperior Court of Delaware · 1969
  2. State of Fla. Ex Rel. Stringer v. QuiggSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  3. In Re Haney for a Writ of Habeas Corpus to Obtain BailIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  4. State v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Walden v. MosleyDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Schiff v. BrennanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Prasan Meechaicum v. James H. Fountain, Sheriff of Reno County, Kansas and J. Stanley Hill, District Judge, 27th Judicial DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  3. Beauchamp v. ElrodAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. Ex Parte QuinnCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Emig v. HaywardUtah Supreme Court · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API