Legal Opinion

Hammerschlag Manuf'g Co. v. Spalding

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided May 8, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. Oil final hearing.

1Opinion of the CourtColt, J.

The fifth claim of the Hammerschlag reissued letters patent No. 8¡480 has been sustained by the court in this circuit, and in a number of other contested cases in several other circuits. Hammerschlag v. Wood, 18 Fed. Rep. 175; Same v. Scamoni, 7 Fed. Rep. 584; Same v. Garrett, 9 Fed. Rep. 43; Same v. Bancroft, 32 Fed. Rep. 585. In the present case, after an exhaustive hearing on the motion for a preliminary injunction, I held that the defendants’ machine came within the scope of these decisions. I see no reason to change the view then taken. I agree with Judge Gresham, in the case of this…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Long v. DickDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941
  2. Stuart v. City of St. PaulU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1894
  3. Tripp Giant Leveller Co. v. BresnahanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API