Stuart v. City of St. Paul
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota
In Equity. This was a motion by the city of St. Paul to vacate a final decree rendered against it upon a bill by Peter Stuart and others, charging infringement of a patent, and to permit the defendant to answer.
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
This is a motion to vacate a final decree rendered June 5, 1893, during the January, 1893, term of this court, against the defendant the city of St. Paul upon a bill charging the infringement of a patent, and to permit the defendant to answer. The motion is denied for the following reasons:
First. The patent on which the bill is based has been sustained after a contest in the circuit court for the eastern district of Pennsylvania in Vulcanite Co. v. American Co., 34 Fed. 320, and in the circuit court for the district of Maryland in Stuart v. Thorman, 37 Fed. 90.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Allen v. WilsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1884
- Hammerschlag Manuf'g Co. v. SpaldingU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1888
- Landesmann v. JonassonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1887
- Rogers v. BowermanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- West Disinfecting Co. v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932