Legal Opinion
Long v. Dick
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 14, 1941No. 1078PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNOR, District Judge.
This action involves the alleged infringement of a patent granted to the plaintiff, Ralph L. Long, on July 9th, 1940, No. 2,207,322. The plaintiff, A. J. Koll Planing Mill, Ltd., a California corporation, has been, since June 15th, 1939, manufacturing .and selling said device by virtue of a license issued to him by the plaintiff, Long. The patent relates to a hanger for sliding doors to simplify and lower the cost of the hanger means for a sliding door by making a track element for the hanger a part of the header or lintel construction of the doorway, thus avoiding…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stearns v. Tinker & RasorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Confederation Life Association v. Vega Y ArminanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Stearns v. RasorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Industrial Models Corp. v. KurtzDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1950