Legal Opinion

Tripp Giant Leveller Co. v. Bresnahan

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided February 9, 1899No. 321Published

This was a rehearing on supplemental bill filed by defendants.

1Opinion of the Court

COLT, Circuit Judge.

This is a rehearing of the suit of the Tripp Griant Leveller Company against Bresnahan and 'others, brought for infringement of the Cutcheon patent, No. 384,893, for improvements in machines for beating out the soles of boots and shoes. On March 15, 1894, after hearing upon pleadings and proofs, this court ordered a decree in favor of the complainant, adjudging the first claim of the patent valid, and infringed by the defendants, and referring the cause to a master for an account of profits and damages. The rehearing is upon the original record and additional proofs…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bresnahan v. Tripp Giant Leveller Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1896
  2. Herrick v. Tripp Giant Leveller Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1893
  3. Office Specialty Manuf'g Co. v. Winternight & Cornyn Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1895
  4. Tripp Giant Leveler Co. v. RogersDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1894
  5. Hammerschlag Manuf'g Co. v. SpaldingU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API