Legal Opinion

Barnet v. Houston

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 19, 1898PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from' Gonzales. Tried below before Hon. M. Kennon.

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, Chief Justice.

This action was by appellant to recover of appellee an undivided half of a 330-acre survey.

The following uncontradicted facts appear: Eliza Barnett owned the land in 1868, and in the spring of that year executed a deed in usual form conveying the tract to Jas. A. and W. L. Barnett, her sons, reciting the consideration of $330, no such consideration, however, existing. Thereupon W. L. Barnett executed to James F. Miller and A. J. McKean as trustee a deed to said tract and another tract belonging to W. L. Barnett individual!)', and a few wagons, accounts, etc., for the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gilder v. City of BrenhamTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Stone v. SledgeTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Moran v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Cole v. NobleTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Wilson v. SimpsonTexas Supreme Court · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Western Assur. Co. v. Hillyer-Deutsch-Jarratt Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. City of Fort Worth v. RosenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  3. Williams v. KincannonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. State ex rel. White v. DickersonNevada Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Howard v. Waale-Camplan & Tiberti, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API