Legal Opinion
California CNG, Inc. v. Southern California Gas Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 19, 1996No. 95-55806PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
California CNG, Inc. and Prime of California, Inc., two California corporations (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Cal CNG”), appeal from the district court’s dismissal of their complaint alleging various violations of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1-7, by Southern California Gas (“SoCalGas”), a California utility company, and by Henderson Engineering, an Illinois corporation. The district court determined that SoCalGas was immune from suit under the “state action” doctrine. We have jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- City of Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Federal Trade Commission v. Ticor Title InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Nugget Hydroelectric, L.P. v. Pacific Gas and Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tyler v. CisnerosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- New York Ex Rel. Spitzer v. Saint Francis HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Tyler v. CisnerosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- California Cng, Inc. v. Southern California Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- William Ellis v. Salt River ProjectCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022