Legal Opinion
New York Ex Rel. Spitzer v. Saint Francis Hospital
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 10, 2000No. 98 Civ. 0939(WCC)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge.
The State of New York (the “State”), by Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, brings this civil action pursuant to state and federal antitrust laws against defendants St. Francis Hospital (“StFrancis”), Vassar Brothers Hospital (“Vassar”) and Mid-Hudson Health (“Mid-Hudson”). The State claims that St. Francis and Vassar, through their agent Mid-Hudson, fixed the rates, terms and conditions for services provided at defendant hospitals and that defendant hospitals wrongfully divided the market for the provision of various services between…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- National Society of Professional Engineers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. ElzanatyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- In re Zinc Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Mahmud v. KaufmannDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- In Re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
- New York Ex Rel. Spitzer v. Saint Francis HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.