Legal Opinion
Tyler v. Cisneros
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 10, 1998No. 97-15005PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs James B. Tyler, et al., are homeowners who live in an area of San Francisco immediately surrounding the site of a low-income housing project to be constructed with federal funds. Plaintiffs argue that defendants-the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), City and County of San Francisco (“City”), Mission Housing Development Corporation (“Mission Housing”), and 1010 SVN Associates-failed to meet the terms of their own Memorandum of Agreement (“the Agreement”), which was designed to mitigate the project’s impact on plaintiffs’ homes.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Apache Survival Coalition v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Boarhead Corporation v. Edwin B. Erickson, Region Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region IIICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Gemtel Corporation Gemtel Wdch Hotel Associates v. Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Shanks v. DresselCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Olson v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Western Organization v. Ryan ZinkeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- In Re Metropolitan Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2007
- San Carlos Apache Tribe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.