Legal Opinion

Twitty v. State

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1987No. 869SC949PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

I

The State first assigns error to the trial court’s conclusion of law that the State’s operation of the PCBs disposal facility “constitutes a public nuisance permanent in nature that has resulted in a diminution in value of plaintiffs’ lands for which plaintiffs are entitled to just compensation.”

On appeal, the conclusions of law drawn by the trial judge are fully reviewable and may be reversed if erroneous. Hofler v. Hill and Hofler v. Hill, 311 N.C. 325, 317 S.E. 2d 670 (1984); Humphries v. City of Jacksonville, 300 N.C. 186, 265 S.E. 2d 189 (1980). A conclusion of law must be…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Long v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Humphries v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Montgomery v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Pendergrast v. AikenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Hildebrand v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Smith v. Kansas Gas Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. Rudd v. Electrolux Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1997
  3. State Ex Rel. Howes v. WR Peele, Sr. TrustDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1995
  4. North Carolina Department of Transportation v. CromartieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. Carroll v. Litton Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API