Legal Opinion

Yamhill County v. Dauenhauer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 12, 1971PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

The defendants appeal from a declaratory judgment decree of the circuit court which held that an initiative measure proposed in Yamhill County “is not a proper and authorized exercise of the initiative procedure * *

In September 1968, the Board of Yamhill County Commissioners placed a bond measure on the general election ballot. It proposed financing the construction of a bridge across the Willamette River to Marion County. The measure passed, as did a similar one in Marion County. Each county was to pay one-fourth of the cost of construction, the balance being borne by a federal grant which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Monahan v. FunkOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  2. In Re Application of BoaltOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Tillamook Peoples' Utility District v. CoatesOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. State Ex Rel. Allen v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Grayson v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Foster v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Amalgamated Transit Union-Division 757 v. YerkovichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Yamhill County v. DauenhauerOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Amalgamated Transit Union-Division 757 v. YerkovichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. Boytano v. FritzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API