Legal Opinion

Tillamook Peoples' Utility District v. Coates

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1944PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, C. J.

This suit was instituted by Tillamook Peoples’ Utility District, a municipal corporation, and E. E. Allen, Jr., John Sehild, A. D. Thompson and M. B. Terry, residents and taxpayers of that district, to enjoin W. Thomas Coates, county clerk of Tillamook county, from submitting to the voters of Tillamook Peoples’ Utility District at the November, 1944, election or any other election, the question of the approval or rejection by such voters of ordinance No. 4 of that district, and for a declaratory judgment to the effect that ordinance No. 4 is not a proper subject of referendum.

The complaint…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Monahan v. FunkOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  2. State v. LordOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  3. State v. MetschanOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Avery v. JobOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Jory v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. City of Roseburg v. Roseburg City Firefighters, Local No. 1489Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. CUPROWSKI v. City of Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  3. City of Aurora v. ZwerdlingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  4. City of Bowie v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  5. Foster v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API