Legal Opinion

Yamhill County v. Dauenhauer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1972PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C. J.

This is a declaratory judgment proceeding to determine whether a proposed measure filed in Yamhill County in July, 1970 by defendants is a proper subject for the initiative procedure. Defendants appealed from the trial court’s judgment for plaintiffs. The Court of Appeals affirmed, 6 Or App 422, 487 P2d 1167 (1971), and defendants filed this petition for review.

The proposed measure provides that,

“Notwithstanding any contrary previous decision made by a majority, vote of the Yamhill County Commissioners, Yamhill County shall in no manner undertake the construction of, or participate in any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Custer City v. RobinsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Garrett v. Tubac-Amado School District No. 5 of Santa Cruz CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  3. Enloe v. BakerArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Yamhill County v. DauenhauerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Foster v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Amalgamated Transit Union-Division 757 v. YerkovichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Boytano v. FritzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Rossolo v. Multnomah County Elections DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. Amalgamated Transit Union-Division 757 v. YerkovichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API