Legal Opinion

In Re Application of Boalt

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1927PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

The first question is, Can a court in a habeas corpus proceeding inquire into the legal status of the court or tribunal issuing the process by which the petitioner is held in custody?

Section 642, Or. L., provides in part that:

“If it appears on the return that the prisoner is in custody by virtue of an order or civil process of any court legally constituted, or issued by an officer in course of judicial proceeding before him authorized by law, such prisoner shall only be discharged in one of the following cases. * *

‘ ‘ 6. When the order or process is not authorized by any judgment or decree of…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Straw v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Rose v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  3. State ex rel. Hawes v. MasonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  4. Ladd v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  5. State v. Port of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1916

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Huffman v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State Ex Rel. Heinig v. City of MilwaukieOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Kuhnhausen v. StadelmanOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. City of Portland v. WelchOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. City of Portland v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1946

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API