Brockmann Industries, Inc. v. Carolina Securities Corp.
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HAMILTON, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.Proc. The court has jurisdiction in that the parties are of diverse citizenship and the amount in controversy exceeds Ten Thousand and No/100 ($10,000.00) Dollars. 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
FACTS
The plaintiffs are Brockmann Industries, Inc. and Karin T. Brockmann, whose husband, Juergen Brockmann, is the president of Brockmann Industries. Defendants are Carolina Securities Corporation and Mark Kronenfeld, an employee of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Tahir Erk v. Glenn L. Martin Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Duke Power Co. v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Latino Project, Inc. v. City of Camden, Melvin Primas, and William HanowskyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Morgan v. American Family Life Assurance Co. of ColumbusDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brockmann Industries, Inc. And Karin T. Brockmann v. Carolina Securities Corp. And Mark A. KronenfeldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988