Legal Opinion

Northam Warren Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 8, 1970No. C.D. 4142PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Watson, Judge:

These protests, consolidated for the purpose of trial, place in issue the classification of merchandise described as “pearl essence”. The importation was classified pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 27(a) (4) (5) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 52739, which provides for mixtures in part of a product provided *585for in paragraph 27 of said act, said product being, in this case phthalic acid, provided for in paragraph 27(a) (1).

Plaintiffs claim that the instant merchandise is properly classifiable pursuant to paragraph 66 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  2. Nestle Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Northam Warren Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  2. United States v. Cavalier Shipping Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  3. Aceto Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  4. Cavalier Shipping Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  5. General Mills, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API