Legal Opinion

Northam Warren Corp. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 22, 1973No. 5455, C.A.D. 1092PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rich, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision and judgment of the United States Customs Court, First Div., 65 Cust. Ct. 584, C.D. 4142 (1970), overruling a protest against the classification of certain importations from the Netherlands of “pearl essence” pigment, containing 0.15 percent of a coal tar derivative known as “Tinopal PCRP,” pursuant to paragraph 27(a) (4) (5) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 52739, which provides for mixtures in part of any of the coal tar products provided for in paragraph 27(a). We affirm.

The importation consists primarily of “pearl essence,” a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Northam Warren Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Solder Removal Co. v. United States International Trade CommissionCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  2. Alcan Aluminum Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Cavalier Shipping Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  4. United States v. Aceto Chemical Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  5. Dow Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API