General Mills, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Watson, Judge:
The three protests consolidated for the purpose of trial, place in issue the classification of two products known as *67Nutralocust NG24 (hereinafter referred to as ÍTG24) and Guartec CAP (hereinafter referred to as CAP). The former is a locust bean gum to which borax has been added while the latter is a guar gum to which small quantities of glyoxal and sulfuric acid have been added.
The importations covered by protest 68/55471 and 68/55472 were classified pursuant to item 493.50 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States as “products chiefly used as assistants in preparing or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- United States v. Sheldon & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Northam Warren Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953