Legal Opinion

General Mills, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 17, 1971No. C.D. 4254Published

1Opinion of the Court

Watson, Judge:

The three protests consolidated for the purpose of trial, place in issue the classification of two products known as *67Nutralocust NG24 (hereinafter referred to as ÍTG24) and Guartec CAP (hereinafter referred to as CAP). The former is a locust bean gum to which borax has been added while the latter is a guar gum to which small quantities of glyoxal and sulfuric acid have been added.

The importations covered by protest 68/55471 and 68/55472 were classified pursuant to item 493.50 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States as “products chiefly used as assistants in preparing or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  2. United States v. Sheldon & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  4. Northam Warren Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  5. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API