Legal Opinion

Aceto Chemical Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 29, 1975No. Court No. 72-2-00263PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Watson, Judge:

These cross-motions for summary judgment center on the presence in the imported fungicide of about three-quarters of a percent of a benzenoid wetting agent. The wetting agent, which is not itself fungicidal in nature, eases the dispersion of the powder in liquid and thus aids the spreading and penetration of the fungicide in wet spray form. It should be noted that the importation may also be applied in a dry form by dusting.

*168The government, relying on the presence of the wetting agent; classified the importation as a mixture in part of a "benzenoid” product.1 Plaintiff claims the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Northam Warren Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  2. United States v. Cavalier Shipping Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  3. Northam Warren Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  4. Cavalier Shipping Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alcan Aluminum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  2. United States v. Aceto Chemical Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  3. F. W. Myers & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
  4. Diachem Industries Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API